On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:49:00AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > You can _never_ assert that a lock is not held, except in some very > restricted corner cases where it's guranteed that your code is running > single-threade (e.g. driver load before you've published any pointers > leading to that lock).
Except that the mistake here was that we thought we were already inside the strictly single threaded recovery phase. Seems a bit blasé not to mention that recovery includes several tricks to break locks. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
