On Wednesday 28 January 2015 09:32 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 02:30:54PM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote:
Mainly taking care of some register offsets, otherwise things are similar to
hsw. Also, programming ddi aux to use hardcoded values for psr data select.

v2: introduce  EDP_PSR_AUX_BASE macro (Chris)
v3: Moving to HW tracking for SKL+ platforms, so activating source psr during
psr_enabling and then avoiding psr entries and exits for each frontbuffer
updates.
v4: Using SKL DDI AUX regs instead of changing PSR_AUX regs definition (Rodrigo)

Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jin...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |    3 ++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h          |    5 +++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c |    7 +++++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c         |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 66f0c60..3d24872 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2371,7 +2371,8 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
  #define HAS_DDI(dev)          (INTEL_INFO(dev)->has_ddi)
  #define HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(dev)   (INTEL_INFO(dev)->has_fpga_dbg)
  #define HAS_PSR(dev)          (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev) || \
-                                IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev))
+                                IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev) || \
+                                IS_SKYLAKE(dev))
  #define HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev)   (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_HASWELL(dev) || \
                                 IS_BROADWELL(dev) || IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
  #define HAS_RC6(dev)          (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index a39bb03..a6f06fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -3748,6 +3748,11 @@ enum punit_power_well {
  #define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_PRECHARGE_TEST            (1 << 11)
  #define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_MASK    (0x7ff)
  #define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_SHIFT   0
+#define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_PSR_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL   (1 << 14)
+#define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FS_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL    (1 << 13)
+#define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_GTC_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL   (1 << 12)
+#define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL_MASK (1f << 5)
+#define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(c) (((c) - 1) << 5)
  #define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(c)   ((c) - 1)
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
index 79f6d72..010d550 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
@@ -156,7 +156,9 @@ void intel_fb_obj_invalidate(struct drm_i915_gem_object 
*obj,
intel_mark_fb_busy(dev, obj->frontbuffer_bits, ring); - intel_psr_invalidate(dev, obj->frontbuffer_bits);
+
+       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 9)
+               intel_psr_invalidate(dev, obj->frontbuffer_bits);
  }
/**
@@ -182,7 +184,8 @@ void intel_frontbuffer_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
intel_mark_fb_busy(dev, frontbuffer_bits, NULL); - intel_psr_flush(dev, frontbuffer_bits);
+       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 9)
+               intel_psr_flush(dev, frontbuffer_bits);
Again no, not going to take wholesale filtering of the sw invalidate
paths. This needs to be properly tested and pushed down into the psr
specific invalidate/flush functions on a per-function basis.

I've dropped these two hunks and merged the patch.
-Daniel
Hi Daniel,
Even SW tracking doesn't work in many cases, like I reported earlier in ubuntu login screen where we don't get frontbuffer flushes and we don't enter PSR at all with SW tracking. I see similar behavior even in fbcon mode. So, I am not sure how you can say that SW tracking is the only right way. If there are cases where HW tracking fails (and I know a few), we need to fix them. I can move this gen check to the intel_psr_* function if that is the major concern.
-Sonika
/*
         * FIXME: Unconditional fbc flushing here is a rather gross hack and
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index dd0e6e0..4867d5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
        struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
        uint32_t aux_clock_divider;
+       uint32_t aux_data_reg, aux_ctl_reg;
        int precharge = 0x3;
        bool only_standby = dev_priv->vbt.psr.full_link;
        static const uint8_t aux_msg[] = {
@@ -168,16 +169,34 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
                drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
                                   DP_PSR_ENABLE | DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE);
+ aux_data_reg = (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) ?
+                               DPA_AUX_CH_DATA1 : EDP_PSR_AUX_DATA1(dev);
+       aux_ctl_reg = (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) ?
+                               DPA_AUX_CH_CTL : EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL(dev);
+
        /* Setup AUX registers */
        for (i = 0; i < sizeof(aux_msg); i += 4)
-               I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_AUX_DATA1(dev) + i,
+               I915_WRITE(aux_data_reg + i,
                           intel_dp_pack_aux(&aux_msg[i], sizeof(aux_msg) - i));
- I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL(dev),
+       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) {
+               uint32_t val;
+
+               val = I915_READ(aux_ctl_reg);
+               val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_MASK;
+               val |= DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_1600us;
+               val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_MASK;
+               val |= (sizeof(aux_msg) << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_SHIFT);
+               /* Use hardcoded data values for PSR */
+               val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_PSR_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL;
+               I915_WRITE(aux_ctl_reg, val);
+       } else {
+               I915_WRITE(aux_ctl_reg,
                   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_400us |
                   (sizeof(aux_msg) << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_SHIFT) |
                   (precharge << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_PRECHARGE_2US_SHIFT) |
                   (aux_clock_divider << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_SHIFT));
+       }
  }
static void vlv_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
@@ -355,6 +374,9 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
/* Enable PSR on the panel */
                hsw_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
+
+               if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
+                       intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
        } else {
                vlv_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
--
1.7.10.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to