On Wednesday 21 January 2015 08:33 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 17:43 +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
Hi

On Friday 16 January 2015 04:41 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Vandana Kannan
<vandana.kan...@intel.com> wrote:
From: Durgadoss R <durgados...@intel.com>

This patch enables eDP DRRS for CHV by adding the
required IS_CHERRYVIEW() checks.
CHV uses the same register bit as VLV.

[Vandana]: Since CHV has 2 sets of M_N registers, it will follow the same code
path as gen < 8. Added CHV check in dp_set_m_n()

Signed-off-by: Durgadoss R <durgados...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kan...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c      | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 25596ca..bb44fb9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -5810,8 +5810,8 @@ void intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
                  * for gen < 8) and if DRRS is supported (to make sure the
                  * registers are not unnecessarily accessed).
                  */
-               if (m2_n2 && INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8 &&
-                       crtc->config.has_drrs) {
+               if (m2_n2 && (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev) || INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8)
+                       && crtc->config.has_drrs) {
This change here doesn't seem safe. As I told on previous comment I'd
prefer changing intel_dp_set_m_n instead of re-using this intel_cpu
one...
Though I am rewriting the intel_dp_set_m_n() that will reuse
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() within.
But as a result, i am going to avoid the parallel usage of
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() and intel_dp_set_m_n().
So I am afraid this check for inclusion of cherryview for m2_n2
programming will be part of the newer code also.

Appending the RFC for the newer intel_dp_set_m_n() implementation
below. Please review.

RFC starts here:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   19
++++++++++++++++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c      |    6
++----
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |    8
+++++++-
  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 061a253..59cc87f
100644
---
a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -5829,13 +5829,26 @@ void intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(struct
intel_crtc *crtc,
         }
  }
-void intel_dp_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc
*crtc)
+void intel_dp_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum link_m_n_set set
= M1_N1)
  {
+       struct intel_link_m_n *dp_m_n,
*dp_m2_n2;
+
+       if (set == M1_N1)
{
+               dp_m_n =
&crtc->config.dp_m_n;
+               dp_m2_n2 =
&crtc->config.dp_m2_n2;
+       } else if (set == M2_N2)
{
+               /* Only one register programming is supported
*/
+               dp_m_n =
&crtc->config.dp_m_n;
+               dp_m2_n2 =
NULL;
+       } else
{
+               DRM_ERROR("Unsupported divider value
\n");
+
return;
+       }
+
         if
(crtc->config.has_pch_encoder)
                 intel_pch_transcoder_set_m_n(crtc,
&crtc->config.dp_m_n);

else
-               intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(crtc,
&crtc->config.dp_m_n,
-
&crtc->config.dp_m2_n2);
+               intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(crtc, dp_m_n,
dp_m2_n2);
  }
static void vlv_update_pll(struct intel_crtc
*crtc,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index b315292..784b8dd
100644
---
a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4817,11 +4817,10 @@ static void intel_dp_set_drrs_state(struct
drm_device *dev, int refresh_rate)
         if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8 && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev))
{
                 switch(index)
{
                 case
DRRS_HIGH_RR:
-
intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc);
+                       intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc,
M1_N1);

break;
                 case
DRRS_LOW_RR:
-
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(intel_crtc,
-                                       &intel_crtc->config.dp_m2_n2,
NULL);
+                       intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc,
M2_N2);

break;
                 case
DRRS_MAX_RR:

default:
@@ -4835,7 +4834,6 @@ static void intel_dp_set_drrs_state(struct
drm_device *dev, int refresh_rate)
                                 val |=
PIPECONF_EDP_RR_MODE_SWITCH_VLV;

else
                                 val |=
PIPECONF_EDP_RR_MODE_SWITCH;
-
intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc);
                 } else
{
                         if
(IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
                                 val &=
~PIPECONF_EDP_RR_MODE_SWITCH_VLV;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 86d31f2..910e613
100644
---
a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -595,6 +595,12 @@ struct intel_hdmi
{
  struct
intel_dp_mst_encoder;
  #define DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS
0x10
+enum link_m_n_set
{
+       M1_N1 =
0,
+
M2_N2,
+
DIVIDER_MAX
do we need this divider_max here?
We dont need this. Removed it in the original patch.

+};
+
  struct intel_dp
{
         uint32_t
output_reg;
         uint32_t
aux_ch_ctl_reg;
@@ -983,7 +989,7 @@ void hsw_enable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv);
  void hsw_disable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv);
  void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc
*crtc,
                       struct intel_crtc_config
*pipe_config);
-void intel_dp_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc
*crtc);
+void intel_dp_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum link_m_n_set set
= M1_N1);
  void intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc
*crtc,
                                  struct intel_link_m_n
*m_n,
                                  struct intel_link_m_n
*m2_n2);
--
1.7.9.5
                         I915_WRITE(PIPE_DATA_M2(transcoder),
                                         TU_SIZE(m2_n2->tu) | m2_n2->gmch_m);
                         I915_WRITE(PIPE_DATA_N2(transcoder), m2_n2->gmch_n);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 3362d93..42195fe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4802,7 +4802,7 @@ static void intel_dp_set_drrs_state(struct drm_device 
*dev, int refresh_rate)
                 return;
         }

-       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) {
+       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8 && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev)) {
                 switch(index) {
                 case DRRS_HIGH_RR:
                         intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc);
--
2.0.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--Ram

But overall it is better and much more clear than previous version.
I have submitted this change for the intel_dp_set_m_n() as V2 of patch set 5/10. So this patch [7/10] doesn't have any change.
Thanks

--Ram
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to