From: Tim Gore <tim.g...@intel.com>

The invalid-flags test in gem_exec_params uses
(I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT << 1) as an invalid flag, but this
is no longer invalid for recent android versions, and may
not be invalid in Linux in the future. So I have changed
this test to use (__I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS) instead.
__I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS is defined in i915_drm.h as a
mask of all the undefined flags.

Signed-off-by: Tim Gore <tim.g...@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_exec_params.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_params.c b/tests/gem_exec_params.c
index f63eda9..2a1c544 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_params.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_params.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ igt_main
        /* HANDLE_LUT and NO_RELOC are already exercised by gem_exec_lut_handle 
*/
 
        igt_subtest("invalid-flag") {
-               execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_RENDER | (I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT << 1);
+               execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_RENDER | (__I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS);
                RUN_FAIL(EINVAL);
        }
 
-- 
2.2.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to