On 16-12-2014 11:34, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:24:23PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:38:08PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
So that we can get rid of the new_config pointer later.
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
<ander.conselvan.de.olive...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index da5af23..a9f3034 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -4897,27 +4897,39 @@ static int valleyview_calc_cdclk(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
/* compute the max pixel clock for new configuration */
-static int intel_mode_max_pixclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+static int intel_mode_max_pixclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ struct intel_crtc *mode_set_crtc,
+ struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_new_state)
{
struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
int max_pixclk = 0;
+ int pixclk;
for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) {
- if (intel_crtc->new_enabled)
- max_pixclk = max(max_pixclk,
-
intel_crtc->new_config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock);
+ if (!intel_crtc->new_enabled)
+ continue;
+
+ if (intel_crtc == mode_set_crtc)
+ pixclk = crtc_new_state->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
+ else
+ pixclk =
intel_crtc->config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
+
+ max_pixclk = max(max_pixclk, pixclk);
I think we're now going backwards. We want atomic modesets, so we
need to be able to compute this stuff when modesetting multiple pipes.
That was precisely why I added new_config.
We've already started going backwards in this area with the latest round
of fastboot patches from Jesse. I've discussed this a bit with him and the
plan is that we'll do it that way and Ander gets shafted^W signed up to
sort out the mess.
But yeah if there's a shortcut to avoid some of that detour it would be
good.
I should improve the commit message. I agree this patch is a step
backwards, but the idea is to move stuff out of the way so we can move
forwards again. The ultimate goal is to pass a drm_atomic_state struct,
and derive the pipe_config from that.
Ander
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
