On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:59:07PM +0000, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gor...@intel.com>
> 
> When querying the GTFIFOCTL register to check the FIFO space, the read value
> must be masked. The operation is repeated explicitly in several places. This
> change refactors the read-and-mask code into a function call.
> 
> Change-Id: Id1a9f3785cb20b82d4caa330c37b31e4e384a3ef
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gor...@intel.com>

Looks like an unrelated patch and probably collides with Mika's forcewake
refactoring. Please rebase on top of that series if still needed.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index 46de8d7..4021831 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,13 @@ assert_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>                 "Device suspended\n");
>  }
>  
> +static inline u32 fifo_free_entries(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +     u32 count = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL);
> +
> +     return count & GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +}
> +
>  static void __gen6_gt_wait_for_thread_c0(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       /* w/a for a sporadic read returning 0 by waiting for the GT
> @@ -154,16 +161,15 @@ static int __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       /* On VLV, FIFO will be shared by both SW and HW.
>        * So, we need to read the FREE_ENTRIES everytime */
>       if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
> -             dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count =
> -                     __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) &
> -                                             GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +             dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count = fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
>  
>       if (dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count < GT_FIFO_NUM_RESERVED_ENTRIES) {
>               int loop = 500;
> -             u32 fifo = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) & 
> GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +             u32 fifo = fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
> +
>               while (fifo <= GT_FIFO_NUM_RESERVED_ENTRIES && loop--) {
>                       udelay(10);
> -                     fifo = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) & 
> GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +                     fifo = fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
>               }
>               if (WARN_ON(loop < 0 && fifo <= GT_FIFO_NUM_RESERVED_ENTRIES))
>                       ++ret;
> @@ -505,8 +511,7 @@ void intel_uncore_forcewake_reset(struct drm_device *dev, 
> bool restore)
>  
>               if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev))
>                       dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count =
> -                             __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) &
> -                             GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
> +                             fifo_free_entries(dev_priv);
>       }
>  
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to