On 12/09/2014 05:21 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 02:33:49PM -0800, michael.h.ngu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com>

By adding a new exec_entry flag, we cleanly mark the shadow objects
as purgeable after they are on the active list.

v2:
- Move 'shadow_batch_obj->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED' inside _get
   fnc (danvet, from v4 6/7 feedback)

Seems duplicated now.
Good eyes! The duplicate does go away in 5/5 as part of moving much of the cmdparser code out of do_execbuffer() but it still doesn't make 4/5 right. Will fix.

Thanks,
Mike
-Daniel


Issue: VIZ-4719
Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c |  2 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 11 ++++++++++-
  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
index e9349e3..9e0ec4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
@@ -128,5 +128,7 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool,
                list_add_tail(&obj->batch_pool_list, &pool->cache_list);
        }

+       obj->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
+
        return obj;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index fccfff5..2071938 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
  #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE (1<<30)
  #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP (1<<29)
  #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS (1<<28)
+#define  __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE (1<<27)

  #define BATCH_OFFSET_BIAS (256*1024)

@@ -226,7 +227,12 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_unreserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma)
        if (entry->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
                vma->pin_count--;

-       entry->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN);
+       if (entry->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE)
+               obj->madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
+
+       entry->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE |
+                         __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN |
+                         __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE);
  }

  static void eb_destroy(struct eb_vmas *eb)
@@ -1410,6 +1416,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
                        goto err;
                }

+               shadow_batch_obj->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
+
                ret = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin(shadow_batch_obj, 4096, 0);
                if (ret)
                        goto err;
@@ -1433,6 +1441,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,

                        vma = i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt(shadow_batch_obj);
                        vma->exec_entry = &shadow_exec_entry;
+                       vma->exec_entry->flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE;
                        drm_gem_object_reference(&shadow_batch_obj->base);
                        list_add_tail(&vma->exec_list, &eb->vmas);

--
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to