We may be hidding bugs by doing that, so let remove it and have the
actual mask value shine through, for better or worse.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 4f63c39..c715ef0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -734,10 +734,10 @@ static int wa_add(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
#define WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \
- WA_REG(addr, (mask) & 0xffff, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask))
+ WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask))
#define WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \
- WA_REG(addr, (mask) & 0xffff, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask))
+ WA_REG(addr, (mask), _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask))
#define WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(addr, mask, value) \
WA_REG(addr, mask, _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value))
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
