From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com>
The size of the batch buffer passed to the kernel is significantly
larger than the size of the batch buffer passed to the function. A
proposed optimization as part of the batch copy kernel series is to
use batch_len for the copy and parse operations, which leads to a
false "batch without MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END" failure for this test.
To fix this, modify the test to set batch_start_offset and batch_len
such that they define the range of actual commands in the batch,
including a few of the surrounding nops for alignment purposes.
v2: update batch_start_offset as well
Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com>
---
tests/gem_exec_parse.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
index 1dc9103..e48b83a 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
@@ -144,16 +144,18 @@ static void exec_split_batch(int fd, uint32_t *cmds,
struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 objs[1];
uint32_t cmd_bo;
uint32_t noop[1024] = { 0 };
+ const int alloc_size = 4096 * 2;
+ const int actual_start_offset = 4096-sizeof(uint32_t);
// Allocate and fill a 2-page batch with noops
- cmd_bo = gem_create(fd, 4096 * 2);
+ cmd_bo = gem_create(fd, alloc_size);
gem_write(fd, cmd_bo, 0, noop, sizeof(noop));
gem_write(fd, cmd_bo, 4096, noop, sizeof(noop));
// Write the provided commands such that the first dword
// of the command buffer is the last dword of the first
// page (i.e. the command is split across the two pages).
- gem_write(fd, cmd_bo, 4096-sizeof(uint32_t), cmds, size);
+ gem_write(fd, cmd_bo, actual_start_offset, cmds, size);
objs[0].handle = cmd_bo;
objs[0].relocation_count = 0;
@@ -166,8 +168,14 @@ static void exec_split_batch(int fd, uint32_t *cmds,
execbuf.buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t)objs;
execbuf.buffer_count = 1;
- execbuf.batch_start_offset = 0;
- execbuf.batch_len = size;
+ // NB: We want batch_start_offset and batch_len to point to the block
+ // of the actual commands (i.e. at the last dword of the first page),
+ // but have to adjust both the start offset and length to meet the
+ // kernel driver's requirements on the alignment of those fields.
+ execbuf.batch_start_offset = actual_start_offset & ~0x7;
+ execbuf.batch_len =
+ ALIGN(size + actual_start_offset - execbuf.batch_start_offset,
+ 0x8);
execbuf.cliprects_ptr = 0;
execbuf.num_cliprects = 0;
execbuf.DR1 = 0;
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
