On 10/23/2014 09:50 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This should allow us to avoid mode sets for some panel fitter config
> changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 48 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 10468a7..84331a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -11420,6 +11420,50 @@ static void disable_crtc_nofb(struct intel_crtc 
> *crtc)
>       crtc->new_config = NULL;
>   }
>   
> +/* Do we need a mode set due to pfit changes? */
> +static bool intel_pfit_changed(struct drm_device *dev,
> +                            struct intel_crtc_config *new_config,
> +                            struct intel_crtc_config *cur_config)
> +{
> +     bool ret = false;
> +
> +     if (HAS_DDI(dev) || HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
> +             /*
> +              * On PCH platforms we can disable pfit w/o a pipe shutdown,
> +              * otherwise we'll need a mode set.
> +              */
> +             if (new_config->pch_pfit.enabled &&
> +                 cur_config->pch_pfit.enabled)
> +                     ret = false;
> +             else if (new_config->pch_pfit.enabled &&
> +                      !cur_config->pch_pfit.enabled)
> +                     ret = true;
> +             else if (!new_config->pch_pfit.enabled &&
> +                      cur_config->pch_pfit.enabled)
> +                     ret = false;
> +             else if (!new_config->pch_pfit.enabled &&
> +                      !cur_config->pch_pfit.enabled)
> +                     ret = false;
> +     } else {
> +             bool new_enabled, old_enabled;
> +
> +             new_enabled = !!(new_config->gmch_pfit.control & PFIT_ENABLE);
> +             old_enabled = !!(cur_config->gmch_pfit.control & PFIT_ENABLE);
> +
> +             /* 9xx only needs a shutdown to disable pfit */
> +             if (new_enabled && old_enabled)
> +                     ret = false;
> +             else if (new_enabled && !old_enabled)
> +                     ret = false;
> +             else if (!new_enabled && old_enabled)
> +                     ret = true;
> +             else if (!new_enabled && !old_enabled)
> +                     ret = false;
> +     }
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static int intel_crtc_set_config(struct drm_mode_set *set)
>   {
>       struct drm_device *dev;
> @@ -11486,6 +11530,10 @@ static int intel_crtc_set_config(struct drm_mode_set 
> *set)
>           to_intel_crtc(set->crtc)->config.has_infoframe)
>               config->mode_changed = true;
>   
> +     if (intel_pfit_changed(dev, to_intel_crtc(set->crtc)->new_config,
> +                            &to_intel_crtc(set->crtc)->config))
> +             config->mode_changed = true;
> +
>       intel_update_pipe_size(to_intel_crtc(set->crtc));

The big comment in intel_update_pipe_size() becomes obsolete with this
patch. It should probably just be removed.

With the comments I made addressed, this series is

Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.olive...@intel.com>








_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to