On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:06:11PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:05:02PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > If we're going to be paranoid I think we should disable all higher WM > > levels whose latency is lower than any of the lower levels. And I > > think we'll want something like dev_priv->wm.max_wm_level instead of > > relying on the zero latency tricks. That thing has been on my TODO > > list since forever. > > Can we go step by step? add this patch and then I noted this as a task > for post merge work. No sure who will end up doing and and if the > sanitazing code can be shared between platforms (probably yes?), but > that can wait a bit longer?
Sure. This seems fine for now. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
