On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:15:14PM +0100, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
I know there's often not a lot to talk about for if you have a refactoring
step that needs to be applied n times. But even then a small commit
message to reiterate what is going on and why and a small note if there's
anything funky goes a long way.
Since in a few months someone will digg out your patch here using git
blame and git lock --pickaxe and will be totally lost without the context
of the entire series. So each patch really needs to be able to be
understood on its own.
-Daniel
>
> For: VIZ-4377
> Signed-off-by: john.c.harri...@intel.com
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> index dc2f4f2..ccd5732 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct intel_overlay {
> u32 flip_addr;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *reg_bo;
> /* flip handling */
> - uint32_t last_flip_req;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_request *last_flip_req;
> void (*flip_tail)(struct intel_overlay *);
> };
>
> @@ -217,17 +217,17 @@ static int intel_overlay_do_wait_request(struct
> intel_overlay *overlay,
> int ret;
>
> BUG_ON(overlay->last_flip_req);
> - ret = i915_add_request(ring, &overlay->last_flip_req);
> + ret = i915_add_request(ring, &overlay->last_flip_req->seqno);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> overlay->flip_tail = tail;
> - ret = i915_wait_seqno(ring, overlay->last_flip_req);
> + ret = i915_wait_seqno(ring,
> i915_gem_request_get_seqno(overlay->last_flip_req));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
>
> - overlay->last_flip_req = 0;
> + overlay->last_flip_req = NULL;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int intel_overlay_continue(struct intel_overlay
> *overlay,
> intel_ring_emit(ring, flip_addr);
> intel_ring_advance(ring);
>
> - return i915_add_request(ring, &overlay->last_flip_req);
> + return i915_add_request(ring, &overlay->last_flip_req->seqno);
> }
>
> static void intel_overlay_release_old_vid_tail(struct intel_overlay *overlay)
> @@ -366,10 +366,10 @@ static int intel_overlay_recover_from_interrupt(struct
> intel_overlay *overlay)
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring = &dev_priv->ring[RCS];
> int ret;
>
> - if (overlay->last_flip_req == 0)
> + if (overlay->last_flip_req == NULL)
> return 0;
>
> - ret = i915_wait_seqno(ring, overlay->last_flip_req);
> + ret = i915_wait_seqno(ring,
> i915_gem_request_get_seqno(overlay->last_flip_req));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
> @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static int intel_overlay_recover_from_interrupt(struct
> intel_overlay *overlay)
> if (overlay->flip_tail)
> overlay->flip_tail(overlay);
>
> - overlay->last_flip_req = 0;
> + overlay->last_flip_req = NULL;
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
