On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:03:53AM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>
> 
> Haswell and later silicon has added a new pixel replication register
> to the pipe timings for each transcoder. Now in addition to the
> DPLL_A_MD register for the pixel clock double, we also need to write
> to the TRANS_MULT_n (0x6002c) register to double the pixel data. Writing
> to the DPLL only double the pixel clock.
> 
> ver2: Macro name change from MULTIPLY to PIPE_MULTI. (Daniel)
> ver3: Do not set pixel multiplier if transcoder is eDP (Ville)
> 
> Cc: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |    3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   10 +++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index ad8179b..035d58c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2443,6 +2443,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
>  #define _PIPEASRC    0x6001c
>  #define _BCLRPAT_A   0x60020
>  #define _VSYNCSHIFT_A        0x60028
> +#define _MULTIPLY_A  0x6002c
>  
>  /* Pipe B timing regs */
>  #define _HTOTAL_B    0x61000
> @@ -2454,6 +2455,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
>  #define _PIPEBSRC    0x6101c
>  #define _BCLRPAT_B   0x61020
>  #define _VSYNCSHIFT_B        0x61028
> +#define _MULTIPLY_B  0x6102c
>  
>  #define TRANSCODER_A_OFFSET 0x60000
>  #define TRANSCODER_B_OFFSET 0x61000
> @@ -2474,6 +2476,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
>  #define BCLRPAT(trans) _TRANSCODER2(trans, _BCLRPAT_A)
>  #define VSYNCSHIFT(trans) _TRANSCODER2(trans, _VSYNCSHIFT_A)
>  #define PIPESRC(trans) _TRANSCODER2(trans, _PIPEASRC)
> +#define PIPE_MULTI(trans) _TRANSCODER2(trans, _MULTIPLY_A)

PIPE_MULT (w/o the 'I') is what the spec called it. Best to follow the
same naming conventiom to make it easier to search for things in the spec.
I would also name the _MULTIPLY_x defines the same way.

>  
>  /* HSW+ eDP PSR registers */
>  #define EDP_PSR_BASE(dev)                       (IS_HASWELL(dev) ? 0x64800 : 
> 0x6f800)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 858011d..f8c1f11 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -4168,6 +4168,11 @@ static void haswell_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>  
>       intel_set_pipe_timings(intel_crtc);
>  
> +     if (intel_crtc->config.cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_EDP) {
> +             I915_WRITE(PIPE_MULTI(intel_crtc->config.cpu_transcoder),
> +                             intel_crtc->config.pixel_multiplier - 1);
> +     }
> +
>       if (intel_crtc->config.has_pch_encoder) {
>               intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(intel_crtc,
>                                    &intel_crtc->config.fdi_m_n, NULL);
> @@ -7853,7 +7858,10 @@ static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc 
> *crtc,
>               pipe_config->ips_enabled = hsw_crtc_supports_ips(crtc) &&
>                       (I915_READ(IPS_CTL) & IPS_ENABLE);
>  
> -     pipe_config->pixel_multiplier = 1;
> +     if (pipe_config->cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_EDP) {
> +             pipe_config->pixel_multiplier =
> +                     I915_READ(PIPE_MULTI(pipe_config->cpu_transcoder)) + 1;
> +     }

else
 pixel_multiplier = 1;

With those fixed/changed this look good.

>  
>       return true;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to