On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:24:55PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This happens in irq_postinstall before we've set the pm._irqs_disabled flag,
> but shouldn't warn. So add a nowarn variant to allow this to happen w/o
> a backtrace and keep the rest of the IRQ tracking code happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
Shouldn't we instead just move the pm._irqs_disabled = false in i915_dma.c
right above the drm_irq_install call? In
intel_runtime_pm_restore_interrupts we also set it to false before we call
the various hooks.
Also the commit message is a bit thin on the usual details like which
commits introduced this regression, so that maintainers know where to
apply this to.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index d5445e7..ec1d9fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,16 @@ static const u32 hpd_status_i915[] = { /* i915 and
> valleyview are the same */
>
> /* For display hotplug interrupt */
> static void
> +ironlake_enable_display_irq_nowarn(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32
> mask)
> +{
> + if ((dev_priv->irq_mask & mask) != 0) {
> + dev_priv->irq_mask &= ~mask;
> + I915_WRITE(DEIMR, dev_priv->irq_mask);
> + POSTING_READ(DEIMR);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void
> ironlake_enable_display_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mask)
> {
> assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> @@ -139,11 +149,7 @@ ironlake_enable_display_irq(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv, u32 mask)
> if (WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv)))
> return;
>
> - if ((dev_priv->irq_mask & mask) != 0) {
> - dev_priv->irq_mask &= ~mask;
> - I915_WRITE(DEIMR, dev_priv->irq_mask);
> - POSTING_READ(DEIMR);
> - }
> + ironlake_enable_display_irq_nowarn(dev_priv, mask);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -3665,7 +3671,7 @@ static int ironlake_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device
> *dev)
> * setup is guaranteed to run in single-threaded context. But we
> * need it to make the assert_spin_locked happy. */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
> - ironlake_enable_display_irq(dev_priv, DE_PCU_EVENT);
> + ironlake_enable_display_irq_nowarn(dev_priv, DE_PCU_EVENT);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
