On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 01:37:09PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com> > > Programing GT IER interrupts was fumbled while enabling Interrupts for > gen8
True, but... > > This is a regression from > commit abd58f0175915bed644aa67c8f69dc571b8280e0 > Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com> > Date: Sat Nov 2 21:07:09 2013 -0700 > > drm/i915/bdw: Implement interrupt changes > > Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > index d5445e7..48c02bc 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > @@ -3812,7 +3812,7 @@ static void gen8_gt_irq_postinstall(struct > drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT | > GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT | > GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT, > - 0, > + dev_priv->pm_rps_events, .. this would now unmask the rps interrupts already in postinstall which isn't quite what we want. I think the best solution might be to just kill the loop below and just init each GT interrupt register set indivually so that you can pass the correct mask to GT_IMR(2). So I'm thinking simply something like this: dev_priv->pm_irq_mask = 0xffffffff; GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(GT, 0, ~gt_interrupts[0], gt_interrupts[0]); GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(GT, 1, ~gt_interrupts[1], gt_interrupts[1]); GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(GT, 2, dev_priv->pm_irq_mask, dev_priv->pm_rps_events); GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(GT, 3, ~gt_interrupts[3], gt_interrupts[3]); > GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT | > GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT > }; > -- > 1.9.1 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
