While those messages are interesting, there aren't _that_ interesting.
We don't need them in the kernel logs by default.

Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index ce890f0..0ce4ac3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4441,7 +4441,7 @@ intel_dp_drrs_init(struct intel_digital_port 
*intel_dig_port,
        }
 
        if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type != SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT) {
-               DRM_INFO("VBT doesn't support DRRS\n");
+               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("VBT doesn't support DRRS\n");
                return NULL;
        }
 
@@ -4449,7 +4449,7 @@ intel_dp_drrs_init(struct intel_digital_port 
*intel_dig_port,
                                        (dev, fixed_mode, connector);
 
        if (!downclock_mode) {
-               DRM_INFO("DRRS not supported\n");
+               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS not supported\n");
                return NULL;
        }
 
@@ -4460,7 +4460,7 @@ intel_dp_drrs_init(struct intel_digital_port 
*intel_dig_port,
        intel_dp->drrs_state.type = dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type;
 
        intel_dp->drrs_state.refresh_rate_type = DRRS_HIGH_RR;
-       DRM_INFO("seamless DRRS supported for eDP panel.\n");
+       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("seamless DRRS supported for eDP panel.\n");
        return downclock_mode;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to