On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:37:37AM -0700, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
> 
> I plan to reuse these for the new logical ring path.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 4a71dd4..254e4c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -574,8 +574,21 @@ out:
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int
> -init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> +void
> +intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> +{
> +     if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL)
> +             return;
> +
> +     kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl));
> +     i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj);
> +
> +     drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base);
> +     ring->scratch.obj = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>  {
>       int ret;
>  
> @@ -648,7 +661,7 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>                          _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_REPLAY_MODE));
>  
>       if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> -             ret = init_pipe_control(ring);
> +             ret = intel_init_pipe_control(ring);
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
>       }
> @@ -676,16 +689,8 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_engine_cs 
> *ring)
>  {
>       struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
>  
> -     if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL)
> -             return;
> -
> -     if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> -             kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl));
> -             i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj);
> -     }
> -
> -     drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base);
> -     ring->scratch.obj = NULL;
> +     if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5)
> +             intel_fini_pipe_control(ring);

It looks like we've changed the behavior such that for the case of
scratch.obj != NULL && gen < 5, we don't unreference scratch.obj.
I don't know if we can ever hit that case though.

Brad

>  }
>  
>  static int gen6_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 599b4ed..42026a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -221,6 +221,9 @@ struct  intel_engine_cs {
>  
>  bool intel_ring_initialized(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
>  
> +void intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
> +int intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
> +
>  static inline unsigned
>  intel_ring_flag(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>  {
> -- 
> 1.9.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to