On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:43:30 -0700 Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Wendy. Daniel has reverted your original commit here: > commit 35554a1bcaaea55c1cfa88c0176c58d2fb3b8013 > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > Date: Tue Jun 10 11:05:16 2014 +0200 > > Revert "Add rc6_residency_counter subtest" > > Note that I absolutely do not agree with the decision to revert your > patch as was stated in the commit message. I am not sure how Daniel got > the impression that I thought this was "in order." > > Can you please resubmit the patch based on the latest intel-gpu-tools? I also made that clear when Daniel and I discussed it. I simply don't understand why a revert was necessary, especially given that we had an incremental patch to address many of the comments. Was the test breaking i-g-t runs (i.e. preventing tests from running)? Was it somehow crashing and causing false reports? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
