On Mon 2014-06-09 11:25:20, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
> > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
> > that it worked for a while.
>
> git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 - you're about
> the 5th report or so that claims this is the culprit but it's
> something else. The above code is definitely not used in i915 so bogus
> bisect result.
Note I did not do the bisect, I only attempted revert and test.
And did three boots of successful s2ram.. only to find out that it
does not really fix s2ram, I was just lucky :-(.
Unfortunately, this means my s2ram problem will be tricky/impossible
to bisect :-(.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
