On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:35:46PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 96ae78d..d8b540b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -401,6 +401,8 @@ struct intel_crtc {
>               /* watermarks currently being used  */
>               struct intel_pipe_wm active;
>       } wm;
> +
> +     wait_queue_head_t vbl_wait;
>  };

A bit late, but found something: Why can't we use dev->vblank[crtc].queue
here? We reuse all the vblank infrastructure already ...

If you want pretty just add a tiny helper function

wait_queue_head_t *drm_crtc_vblank_waitqueue(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
{
        return &dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(crtc)].queue;
}

somewhere.

I feel guilty here since I've killed Akash's patch over adding a new
vblank wait queue and let yours slip through ;-) Can you please take care
of this?

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to