From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Checking whether the error interrupt was enabled or not isn't really
necessary when we check for uncleared FIFO underruns. If it was enabled
we'll race with the interrupt handler a bit, but that seems OK as we
still claim the interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 862964f..dd6e359 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -337,13 +337,9 @@ static void ivybridge_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct
drm_device *dev,
ironlake_enable_display_irq(dev_priv, DE_ERR_INT_IVB);
} else {
- bool was_enabled = !(I915_READ(DEIMR) & DE_ERR_INT_IVB);
-
- /* Change the state _after_ we've read out the current one. */
ironlake_disable_display_irq(dev_priv, DE_ERR_INT_IVB);
- if (!was_enabled &&
- (I915_READ(GEN7_ERR_INT) & ERR_INT_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pipe))) {
+ if (I915_READ(GEN7_ERR_INT) & ERR_INT_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pipe)) {
DRM_ERROR("uncleared fifo underrun on pipe %c\n",
pipe_name(pipe));
}
@@ -421,14 +417,9 @@ static void cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct
drm_device *dev,
ibx_enable_display_interrupt(dev_priv, SDE_ERROR_CPT);
} else {
- uint32_t tmp = I915_READ(SERR_INT);
- bool was_enabled = !(I915_READ(SDEIMR) & SDE_ERROR_CPT);
-
- /* Change the state _after_ we've read out the current one. */
ibx_disable_display_interrupt(dev_priv, SDE_ERROR_CPT);
- if (!was_enabled &&
- (tmp & SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pch_transcoder))) {
+ if (I915_READ(SERR_INT) &
SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pch_transcoder)) {
DRM_ERROR("uncleared pch fifo underrun on pch
transcoder %c\n",
transcoder_name(pch_transcoder));
}
--
1.8.5.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
