On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 04:40:23PM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nikula, Jani <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 6:37 PM
> > To: Shankar, Uma <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> > [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; Shankar, Uma <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat
> > header
> > 
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026, Uma Shankar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Display Code is made independent of i915_reg.h, hence it can be
> > > dropped from compat header.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <[email protected]>
> > 
> > I already sent the same patch earlier, but *shrug*.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> 
> Pushed to drm-xe-next. Thanks for the review.

Even though this is an Xe patch it might have been better to send this
one through drm-intel-next rather than drm-xe-next since drm-xe-next
doesn't have the prerequisite display patches yet to make this header
removal possible.  So at the moment the build of drm-xe-next is broken.
Not a huge issue since drm-tip is fine, and drm-xe-next will likely be
fixed soon whenever a backmerge happens, but I figured I should point it
out.


Matt

> 
> Regards,
> Uma Shankar
> 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h | 6 ------
> > >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> > >  delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h
> > > deleted file mode 100644
> > > index 8619ec015ad4..000000000000
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ /dev/null
> > > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
> > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > > -/*
> > > - * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
> > > - */
> > > -
> > > -#include "../../i915/i915_reg.h"
> > 
> > --
> > Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

Reply via email to