On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:31:39AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote: > > > On 4/10/2014 1:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:42:42AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 4/9/2014 10:23 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:30:52PM +0000, S, Deepak wrote: > >>>>> Hi Ville, > >>>>> > >>>>> I am Ok with cleaning up and pushing the Code. Can you please tell me > >>>>> when we need to start pushing the code and branch to use > >>>>> (drm-intel-next)? > >>>> > >>>> Well you can consider it pushed now that it's in the open. The patches > >>>> just need a bit of extra polish I think. Well, unless you're planning > >>>> a full blown rewrite of the code ;) > >>>> > >>>> I guess you need to take into consideration whatever bdw rc6/rps patches > >>>> are still in flight, but since you've been doing some review there I > >>>> think you have a better idea than I do how things are progressing. > >>>> > >>>> I always work on top of nightly, so I guess that's a good choice :) > >>> > >>> Yes, -nightly is always the recommended branch to base upstream patches > >>> on. I'll sort out the conflict mess (or well, try to) if it doesn't apply > >>> to plain dinq or some other branch. drm-intel-next tends to be too > >>> outdated ;-) > >>> -Daniel > >> > >> Hi Daniel/Ville. > >> > >> Some of the patches are lined up for squashing right? So you want me > >> to work on this patches to align to upstream code and resubmit it to > >> same email thread? > > > > Hm, I expect this chv thread to become a bit mess really quickly tbh ;-) > > And since we don't have chv merged yet there's not really a baseline to do > > this on top. > > > > I guess the simplest approach would be for you to grab ville's chv tree, > > squash in the patches as discussed and then just starting on polishing > > your chv patches. Then as I pull in patches from this series you can drop > > them from yours. A bit messy, but I don't see any other approach really. > > > > Note that a pile of people are signed up to review this, so maybe hold off > > a bit until the review for your patches have been done. > > -Daniel > > Thanks Daniel. > Ville can you please share your chv tree details?
I rebased the lot and pushed here: git://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/linux.git chv_rebase -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
