From: pengdonglin <pengdong...@xiaomi.com>

Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function 
definitions")
there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and
rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace
period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(),
also implies rcu_read_lock().

There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
been started implicitly by spin_lock().

Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation.

Cc: Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdong...@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <dolinux.p...@gmail.com>
---
 net/mac80211/cfg.c            | 2 --
 net/mac80211/debugfs.c        | 2 --
 net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c | 2 --
 net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c    | 2 --
 net/mac80211/sta_info.c       | 2 --
 5 files changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
index 2ed07fa121ab..4fe50d4c461d 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
@@ -4825,7 +4825,6 @@ static int ieee80211_get_txq_stats(struct wiphy *wiphy,
        int ret = 0;
 
        spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
-       rcu_read_lock();
 
        if (wdev) {
                sdata = IEEE80211_WDEV_TO_SUB_IF(wdev);
@@ -4851,7 +4850,6 @@ static int ieee80211_get_txq_stats(struct wiphy *wiphy,
        }
 
 out:
-       rcu_read_unlock();
        spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
 
        return ret;
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
index e8b78ec682da..82099f4cedbe 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static ssize_t aqm_read(struct file *file,
        int len = 0;
 
        spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
-       rcu_read_lock();
 
        len = scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
                        "access name value\n"
@@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static ssize_t aqm_read(struct file *file,
                        fq->limit,
                        fq->quantum);
 
-       rcu_read_unlock();
        spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
 
        return simple_read_from_buffer(user_buf, count, ppos,
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
index 1dac78271045..30a5a978a678 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c
@@ -625,7 +625,6 @@ static ssize_t ieee80211_if_fmt_aqm(
        txqi = to_txq_info(sdata->vif.txq);
 
        spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
-       rcu_read_lock();
 
        len = scnprintf(buf,
                        buflen,
@@ -642,7 +641,6 @@ static ssize_t ieee80211_if_fmt_aqm(
                        txqi->tin.tx_bytes,
                        txqi->tin.tx_packets);
 
-       rcu_read_unlock();
        spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
 
        return len;
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
index 49061bd4151b..ef75255d47d5 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ static ssize_t sta_aqm_read(struct file *file, char __user 
*userbuf,
                return -ENOMEM;
 
        spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
-       rcu_read_lock();
 
        p += scnprintf(p,
                       bufsz + buf - p,
@@ -178,7 +177,6 @@ static ssize_t sta_aqm_read(struct file *file, char __user 
*userbuf,
                               test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_DIRTY, &txqi->flags) ? " 
DIRTY" : "");
        }
 
-       rcu_read_unlock();
        spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
 
        rv = simple_read_from_buffer(userbuf, count, ppos, buf, p - buf);
diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
index 8c550aab9bdc..663318a75d7f 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
@@ -2637,13 +2637,11 @@ static void sta_set_tidstats(struct sta_info *sta,
 
        if (link_id < 0 && tid < IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS) {
                spin_lock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
-               rcu_read_lock();
 
                tidstats->filled |= BIT(NL80211_TID_STATS_TXQ_STATS);
                ieee80211_fill_txq_stats(&tidstats->txq_stats,
                                         to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[tid]));
 
-               rcu_read_unlock();
                spin_unlock_bh(&local->fq.lock);
        }
 }
-- 
2.34.1

Reply via email to