On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 17:58 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> In order to help with debugging print both the original wm
> latencies read from the mailbox/etc., and the final fixed/adjusted
> values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com>

--
Cheers,
Luca.



>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index d334cc661328..a40113aa3f3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -3346,9 +3346,11 @@ static void skl_setup_wm_latency(struct intel_display 
> *display)
>       else
>               skl_read_wm_latency(display);
>  
> +     intel_print_wm_latency(display, "original", display->wm.skl_latency);
> +
>       adjust_wm_latency(display);
>  
> -     intel_print_wm_latency(display, "Gen9 Plane", display->wm.skl_latency);
> +     intel_print_wm_latency(display, "adjusted", display->wm.skl_latency);
>  }
>  
>  static struct intel_global_state *intel_dbuf_duplicate_state(struct 
> intel_global_obj *obj)

Reply via email to