> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Jouni 
> Högander
> Sent: Friday, 12 September 2025 9.41
> To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogan...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/alpm: Remove error handling from 
> get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time
> 
> Getter for LFPS cycle min/max times is unnecessarily checking faulty port 
> clock value. This doesn't make sense as erroneous port
> clock value would have been noticed already at this point. Remove this check 
> and use 140/800 ns always when port clock >
> 540000.
> 

Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogan...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c | 29 +++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index ed7a7ed486b5..749119cc0b28 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -58,43 +58,32 @@ static int get_silence_period_symbols(const struct 
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>               1000 / 1000;
>  }
> 
> -static int get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(const struct intel_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state,
> -                                    int *min, int *max)
> +static void get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(const struct intel_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state,
> +                                     int *min, int *max)
>  {
>       if (crtc_state->port_clock < 540000) {
>               *min = 65 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT;
>               *max = 75 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT;
> -     } else if (crtc_state->port_clock <= 810000) {
> +     } else {
>               *min = 140;
>               *max = 800;
> -     } else {
> -             *min = *max = -1;
> -             return -1;
>       }
> -
> -     return 0;
>  }
> 
>  static int get_lfps_cycle_time(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)  {
> -     int tlfps_cycle_min, tlfps_cycle_max, ret;
> +     int tlfps_cycle_min, tlfps_cycle_max;
> 
> -     ret = get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(crtc_state, &tlfps_cycle_min,
> -                                       &tlfps_cycle_max);
> -     if (ret)
> -             return ret;
> +     get_lfps_cycle_min_max_time(crtc_state, &tlfps_cycle_min,
> +                                 &tlfps_cycle_max);
> 
>       return tlfps_cycle_min +  (tlfps_cycle_max - tlfps_cycle_min) / 2;  }
> 
>  static int get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(const struct intel_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state)  {
> -     int lfps_cycle_time = get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state);
> -
> -     if (lfps_cycle_time < 0)
> -             return -1;
> -
> -     return lfps_cycle_time * crtc_state->port_clock / 1000 / 1000 / (2 * 
> LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT);
> +     return get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state) * crtc_state->port_clock / 1000 /
> +             1000 / (2 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT);
>  }
> 
>  /*
> @@ -146,8 +135,6 @@ _lnl_compute_aux_less_alpm_params(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp,
>       silence_period = get_silence_period_symbols(crtc_state);
> 
>       lfps_half_cycle = get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(crtc_state);
> -     if (lfps_half_cycle < 0)
> -             return false;
> 
>       if (aux_less_wake_lines > ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK ||
>           silence_period > PORT_ALPM_CTL_SILENCE_PERIOD_MASK ||
> --
> 2.43.0

Reply via email to