On 9/12/25 2:50 AM, pengdonglin wrote:
From: pengdonglin <pengdong...@xiaomi.com>
When CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is disabled, spin_lock*() operations implicitly
disable preemption, which provides RCU read-side protection. When
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled, spin_lock*() implementations internally
manage RCU read-side critical sections.
I have some doubt about your claim that disabling preemption provides
RCU read-side protection. It is true for some flavors but probably not
all. I do know that disabling interrupt will provide RCU read-side
protection. So for spin_lock_irq*() calls, that is valid. I am not sure
about spin_lock_bh(), maybe it applies there too. we need some RCU
people to confirm.
When CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled, rt_spin_lock/unlock() will call
rcu_read_lock/_unlock() internally. So eliminating explicit
rcu_read_lock/unlock() in critical sections should be fine.
Cheers,
Longman