On Mon, 04 Aug 2025, René Herman <rene.her...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04-08-2025 10:21, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Sat, 02 Aug 2025, René Herman <rene.her...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I.e., could while working with the person with the hardware not figure >>> out what the point of that i915_drrs_ctl would be if the system >>> immediately enabled it again anyway, so Arun's approach seems to make >>> sense to me. >> >> Hacking debugfs is not a fix, it's a hack. > > So I take it that's a no then on looking at/fixing the DRRS bug?
All I'm saying is that any fix must not depend on the user having to use a debugfs or a module parameter. It needs to work out of the box. BR, Jani. > Please > don't get me wrong; as said to Arun as well, I have no experience with > either this code or really anything concerning this technology even: I > am assuming I'm missing something when I couldn't figure out why the > DRRS disable CTL existed when the system activated it again immediately > anyway. > > I am/was trying that help that user, and maybe you guys as to having > this issue on the map; that already reported bug is 4 year's old, so it > didn't seem to otherwise have a lot of traction. > > Kind regards, > Rene -- Jani Nikula, Intel
