Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2025-05-22 09:41:27) > This reverts commit d6e020819612a4a06207af858e0978be4d3e3140. > > The IS_DGFX check was put in place because error capture of buffer > objects is expected to be broken on devices with VRAM. > > We seem to have already submitted the userspace fix to remove that > flag, so lets just rely on that for DG1.
Further, it seems that the userspace fix[1] has already been pushed and released as part of media-driver 25.2.3, so really no reason to unblock the broken codepath. [1] https://github.com/intel/media-driver/commit/93c07d9b4b96a78bab21f6acd4eb863f4313ea4a Regards, Joonas > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v6.0+ > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.sh...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com> > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellst...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursu...@ursulin.net> > Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > index 7d44aadcd5a5..02c59808cbe4 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > @@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@ static int eb_capture_stage(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) > continue; > > if (i915_gem_context_is_recoverable(eb->gem_context) && > - GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(eb->i915) > IP_VER(12, 10)) > + (IS_DGFX(eb->i915) || GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(eb->i915) > > IP_VER(12, 0))) > return -EINVAL; > > for_each_batch_create_order(eb, j) { > -- > 2.49.0 >