On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:36:08 +0100
Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> +static void
> +i915_gem_stop_ringbuffers(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
> + intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(ring);
> +}
> +
You've improved the init/alloc ringbuffer naming, but this one
confuses me. stop_ringbuffers to me says we're just idling them, but
cleanup_ring_buffer actually does the unmap and free right?
If so, it looks like this will still tear things down on suspend?
Maybe it's all the refactoring making me miss it. :)
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
