On 04/02/2014 02:21 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:06:28PM +0300, Antti Koskipaa wrote: > <snip> >> @@ -184,9 +192,6 @@ static void test_crc_offscreen(test_data_t *test_data) >> do_test(test_data, left - (cursor_w+512), right + (cursor_w+512), top >> , bottom ); >> do_test(test_data, left , right , top - >> (cursor_h+512), bottom + (cursor_h+512)); >> do_test(test_data, left - (cursor_w+512), right + (cursor_w+512), top - >> (cursor_h+512), bottom + (cursor_h+512)); >> - >> - /* go nuts */ >> - do_test(test_data, INT_MIN, INT_MAX, INT_MIN, INT_MAX); > > Why are you dropping the go nuts test? We had an actual bug in the > driver that this managed to hit. We should keep this test to avoid > regressions.
Link please. Cairo went nuts with that one, but if there is a case for the test, I'll work around Cairo to keep it. -- - Antti _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
