On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:58:18AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:11:21PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > The computation of required framebuffer size in > > > > commit d978ef14456a38034f6c0e94a794129501f89200 > > Author: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > > Date: Fri Mar 7 08:57:51 2014 -0800 > > > > drm/i915: Wrap the preallocated BIOS framebuffer and preserve for KMS > > fbcon v12 > > > > is too optimistic, and would rely on the invariant fb being > > reconstructed to exactly fit each pipe (and probably ignore hardware > > limits). Instead, we want to compute the upper bound on what the display > > engine will access and ensure that is within the inherited framebuffer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > > Ping. The code is just waiting to explode.
I kinda hoped it would magically get reviewed by Jesse. Thanks for the ping, patch is picked up for -fixes. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
