From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>

Because gen6_gt_force_wake_{get,put} should already be responsible for
getting/putting runtime PM. If we keep these calls, debugfs will not
be testing the get/put calls of the forcewake functions.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 2bf7c42..b27b7a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -3699,7 +3699,6 @@ static int i915_forcewake_open(struct inode *inode, 
struct file *file)
        if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6)
                return 0;
 
-       intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
        gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
 
        return 0;
@@ -3714,7 +3713,6 @@ static int i915_forcewake_release(struct inode *inode, 
struct file *file)
                return 0;
 
        gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
-       intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 
        return 0;
 }
-- 
1.8.5.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to