On 03/27/2014 11:43 AM, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com>
> 
> There is some thought that the data from the performance counters enabled
> via OACONTROL should only be available to the process that enabled counting.
> To limit snooping, require that any batch buffer which sets OACONTROL to a
> non-zero value also sets it back to 0 before the end of the batch.
> 
> This requires limiting OACONTROL writes to happen via MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM
> so that we can access the value being written. This should be in line with
> the expected use case for writing OACONTROL.
> 
> Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
> Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c | 35 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
> index 2eb2aca..779e14c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
> @@ -407,12 +407,7 @@ static const u32 gen7_render_regs[] = {
>       REG64(CL_PRIMITIVES_COUNT),
>       REG64(PS_INVOCATION_COUNT),
>       REG64(PS_DEPTH_COUNT),
> -     /*
> -      * FIXME: This is just to keep mesa working for now, we need to check
> -      * that mesa resets this again and that it doesn't use any of the
> -      * special modes which write into the gtt.
> -      */
> -     OACONTROL,
> +     OACONTROL, /* Only allowed for LRI and SRM. See below. */
>       REG64(GEN7_SO_NUM_PRIMS_WRITTEN(0)),
>       REG64(GEN7_SO_NUM_PRIMS_WRITTEN(1)),
>       REG64(GEN7_SO_NUM_PRIMS_WRITTEN(2)),
> @@ -761,7 +756,8 @@ bool i915_needs_cmd_parser(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
>  static bool check_cmd(const struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>                     const struct drm_i915_cmd_descriptor *desc,
>                     const u32 *cmd,
> -                   const bool is_master)
> +                   const bool is_master,
> +                   bool *oacontrol_set)
>  {
>       if (desc->flags & CMD_DESC_REJECT) {
>               DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: Rejected command: 0x%08X\n", *cmd);
> @@ -777,6 +773,23 @@ static bool check_cmd(const struct intel_ring_buffer 
> *ring,
>       if (desc->flags & CMD_DESC_REGISTER) {
>               u32 reg_addr = cmd[desc->reg.offset] & desc->reg.mask;
>  
> +             /*
> +              * OACONTROL requires some special handling for writes. We
> +              * want to make sure that any batch which enables OA also
> +              * disables it before the end of the batch. The goal is to
> +              * prevent one process from snooping on the perf data from
> +              * another process. To do that, we need to check the value
> +              * that will be written to the register. Hence, limit
> +              * OACONTROL writes to only MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM commands.
> +              */
> +             if (reg_addr == OACONTROL) {
> +                     if (desc->cmd.value == MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM)
> +                             return false;

While I don't need the ability to use LRM on OACONTROL, I don't see any
specific reason to prohibit it, as long as there's a later LRI of 0.

I think you could just do:

if (desc->cmd.value == MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM)
   oacontrol_set = true;

which will later get cleared if it sees a LRI of 0, and if not, you
reject the batch.

> +
> +                     if (desc->cmd.value == MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1))
> +                             *oacontrol_set = (cmd[2] != 0) ? true : false;

You shouldn't need to do both != 0 and ? true : false...

*oacontrol_set = cmd[2] != 0;

Thanks for implementing this!  That was surprisingly less code than I
thought.

> +             }
> +
>               if (!valid_reg(ring->reg_table,
>                              ring->reg_count, reg_addr)) {
>                       if (!is_master ||
> @@ -851,6 +864,7 @@ int i915_parse_cmds(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>       u32 *cmd, *batch_base, *batch_end;
>       struct drm_i915_cmd_descriptor default_desc = { 0 };
>       int needs_clflush = 0;
> +     bool oacontrol_set = false; /* OACONTROL tracking. See check_cmd() */
>  
>       ret = i915_gem_obj_prepare_shmem_read(batch_obj, &needs_clflush);
>       if (ret) {
> @@ -900,7 +914,7 @@ int i915_parse_cmds(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>                       break;
>               }
>  
> -             if (!check_cmd(ring, desc, cmd, is_master)) {
> +             if (!check_cmd(ring, desc, cmd, is_master, &oacontrol_set)) {
>                       ret = -EINVAL;
>                       break;
>               }
> @@ -908,6 +922,11 @@ int i915_parse_cmds(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>               cmd += length;
>       }
>  
> +     if (oacontrol_set) {
> +             DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: batch set OACONTROL but did not clear 
> it\n");
> +             ret = -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
>       if (cmd >= batch_end) {
>               DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: Got to the end of the buffer w/o a BBE 
> cmd!\n");
>               ret = -EINVAL;
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to