> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 2:29 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/dsb: Allow DSB based commits when scalers are in
> use
> 
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Have DSB perform plane scaler programming as well. Changes to pfit/pipe scaler
> are not being done on the dsb since those take the fastset path. However we do
> now allow DSB based plane updates when the pfit/pipe scaler is currently
> enabled (the pfit/pipe scaler just won't be touched by the DSB).
> 
> Fortunately the hardware issue where some scaler registers are latched at 
> frame
> start and some at start of vblank has been fixed on icl+ (IIRC), and since 
> DSB is
> tgl+ only we don't have to do any changes to the DSB vblank evasion.
> Not that we handle that hardware issue correctly in the CPU vblank evasion
> either...

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.sha...@intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 826b001a66fa..7fd12abdf969 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -7319,8 +7319,6 @@ static void intel_atomic_dsb_prepare(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>                                    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  {
>       struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
> -     const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> -             intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>       struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
>               intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> 
> @@ -7334,8 +7332,6 @@ static void intel_atomic_dsb_prepare(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>       new_crtc_state->use_dsb =
>               !new_crtc_state->do_async_flip &&
>               (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 20 || !new_crtc_state->has_psr) &&
> -             !new_crtc_state->scaler_state.scaler_users &&
> -             !old_crtc_state->scaler_state.scaler_users &&
>               !intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state) &&
>               !intel_crtc_needs_fastset(new_crtc_state);
> 
> @@ -7345,6 +7341,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_dsb_prepare(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,  static void intel_atomic_dsb_finish(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>                                   struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  {
> +     struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
>       struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
>               intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> 
> @@ -7391,6 +7388,10 @@ static void intel_atomic_dsb_finish(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>               intel_crtc_planes_update_arm(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit,
>                                            state, crtc);
> 
> +             if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 9)
> +                     skl_detach_scalers(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit,
> +                                        new_crtc_state);
> +
>               if (!new_crtc_state->dsb_color_vblank) {
>                       intel_dsb_wait_vblanks(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit,
> 1);
> 
> --
> 2.45.3

Reply via email to