On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:51:21PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> wrote:
> > At the end of a 128b/132b link training sequence, the HW expects the
> > transcoder training pattern to be set to TPS2 and from that to normal
> > mode (disabling the training pattern). Transitioning from TPS1 directly
> > to normal mode leaves the transcoder in a stuck state, resulting in
> > page-flip timeouts later in the modeset sequence.
> >
> > Atm, in case of a failure during link training, the transcoder may be
> > still set to output the TPS1 pattern. Later the transcoder is then set
> > from TPS1 directly to normal mode in intel_dp_stop_link_train(), leading
> > to modeset failures later as described above. Fix this by setting the
> > training patter to TPS2, if the link training failed at any point.
> >
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v5.18+
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
>
> No bspec link for this?
The only clue I see for this is PTL's (and other platforms') modeset
page (68849) "Enable Sequence" 6. n.: "If DP v2.0/128b, set DP_TP_CTL
link training pattern 2."
Since setting TPS2 is normally part of the link training (described by
6. l./m.), so the only reason mentioning it as a separate step for
128b/132b (vs. 8b/10b for which it is not mentioned), could be this HW
behavior.
It's obscure imo, could've been explained in the spec better. I can
clarify this in the commit log and also file a bspec ticket for it.
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Thanks.
>
> > ---
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > index 3cc06c916017d..11953b03bb6aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > @@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_link_train(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp,
> >
> > if (wait_for(intel_dp_128b132b_intra_hop(intel_dp, crtc_state) == 0,
> > 500)) {
> > lt_err(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX, "128b/132b intra-hop not
> > clear\n");
> > - return false;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
> > if (intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(intel_dp, crtc_state) &&
> > @@ -1575,6 +1575,19 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_link_train(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp,
> > passed ? "passed" : "failed",
> > crtc_state->port_clock, crtc_state->lane_count);
> >
> > +out:
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure that the training pattern does get set to TPS2 even in case
> > + * of a failure, as is the case at the end of a passing link training
> > + * and what is expected by the transcoder. Leaving TPS1 set (and
> > + * disabling the link train mode in DP_TP_CTL later from TPS1 directly)
> > + * would result in a stuck transcoder HW state and flip-done timeouts
> > + * later in the modeset sequence.
> > + */
> > + if (!passed)
> > + intel_dp_program_link_training_pattern(intel_dp, crtc_state,
> > + DP_PHY_DPRX,
> > DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_2);
> > +
> > return passed;
> > }
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
