On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.so...@intel.com> wrote:
> In the hope of contributing to type safety in our code, let's ensure
> that the type returned by the POWER_DOMAIN_*() macros is always of type
> enum intel_display_power_domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.so...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> index 3caa3f517a32..ab4c9a1e7e02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> @@ -117,12 +117,13 @@ enum intel_display_power_domain {
> POWER_DOMAIN_INVALID = POWER_DOMAIN_NUM,
> };
>
> -#define POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE(pipe) ((int)(pipe) + POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A)
> +#define POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE(pipe) \
> + ((enum intel_display_power_domain)((int)(pipe) + 1 +
> POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A))
^^^^^^^
What's with the +1?
> #define POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_PANEL_FITTER(pipe) \
> - ((int)(pipe) + POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_PANEL_FITTER_A)
> + ((enum intel_display_power_domain)((int)(pipe) +
> POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_PANEL_FITTER_A))
> #define POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(tran) \
> ((tran) == TRANSCODER_EDP ? POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP : \
> - (int)(tran) + POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A)
> + (enum intel_display_power_domain)((int)(tran) +
> POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A))
>
> struct intel_power_domain_mask {
> DECLARE_BITMAP(bits, POWER_DOMAIN_NUM);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
