On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Drop the UHBR limitation from DP SST DSC, and handle SST DSC bandwidth
>> computation for UHBR using intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config().
>> 
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
>
> With the DPT bpp and bpp_step fixes on the list, this seems to work on a
> DP2.0 dock on (SST) UHBR link/DSC mode.

\o/

Thanks for the review and testing!

>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index cc6aba353c11..eb8f6806166c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -1958,15 +1958,37 @@ static int dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp 
>> *intel_dp,
>>              for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
>>                   lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
>>                   lane_count <<= 1) {
>> -                    if (!is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(dsc_bpp_x16, 
>> link_rate,
>> -                                                         lane_count, 
>> adjusted_mode->clock,
>> -                                                         
>> pipe_config->output_format,
>> -                                                         timeslots))
>> -                            continue;
>>  
>> +                    /*
>> +                     * FIXME: intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config() requires
>> +                     * ->lane_count and ->port_clock set before we know
>> +                     * they'll work. If we end up failing altogether,
>> +                     * they'll remain in crtc state. This shouldn't matter,
>> +                     * as we'd then bail out from compute config, but it's
>> +                     * just ugly.
>> +                     */
>>                      pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
>>                      pipe_config->port_clock = link_rate;
>>  
>> +                    if (drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(link_rate)) {
>> +                            int ret;
>> +
>> +                            ret = intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(intel_dp,
>> +                                                                 
>> pipe_config,
>> +                                                                 conn_state,
>> +                                                                 
>> dsc_bpp_x16,
>> +                                                                 
>> dsc_bpp_x16,
>> +                                                                 0, true);
>> +                            if (ret)
>> +                                    continue;
>> +                    } else {
>> +                            if 
>> (!is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(dsc_bpp_x16, link_rate,
>> +                                                                 
>> lane_count, adjusted_mode->clock,
>> +                                                                 
>> pipe_config->output_format,
>> +                                                                 timeslots))
>> +                                    continue;
>> +                    }
>> +
>>                      return 0;
>>              }
>>      }
>> @@ -2493,9 +2515,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_limits(struct intel_dp 
>> *intel_dp,
>>      limits->min_rate = intel_dp_min_link_rate(intel_dp);
>>      limits->max_rate = intel_dp_max_link_rate(intel_dp);
>>  
>> -    /* FIXME 128b/132b SST+DSC support missing */
>> -    if (!is_mst && dsc)
>> -            limits->max_rate = min(limits->max_rate, 810000);
>>      limits->min_rate = min(limits->min_rate, limits->max_rate);
>>  
>>      limits->min_lane_count = intel_dp_min_lane_count(intel_dp);
>> -- 
>> 2.39.5
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to