On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:50:34AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Currently we don't account for the VT-d alignment w/a in
> > plane->min_alignment() which means that panning inside a larger
> > framebuffer can still cause the plane SURF to be misaligned.
> > Fix the issue by moving the VT-d alignment w/a into
> > plane->min_alignment() itself (for the affected platforms).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c          | 10 ++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c        |  5 +++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c        |  8 --------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c        |  5 +++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c |  4 ++++
> >  5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
> > index ed171fbf8720..19cc34babef3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
> > @@ -780,9 +780,14 @@ unsigned int vlv_plane_min_alignment(struct 
> > intel_plane *plane,
> >                                  const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >                                  int color_plane)
> >  {
> > +   struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> > +
> >     if (intel_plane_can_async_flip(plane, fb->modifier))
> >             return 256 * 1024;
> >  
> > +   if (intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
> > +           return 256 * 1024;
> 
> Nitpick, would be great to convert intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa() to
> struct intel_display first, so we wouldn't have to introduce so many new
> struct drm_i915_private uses.

I didn't really want to add intel_display stuff to the
gem side (where this is being used currently). Once
its all moved into the display code (patch 3) then it
makes more sense.

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> > +
> >     switch (fb->modifier) {
> >     case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> >             return 4 * 1024;
> > @@ -798,9 +803,14 @@ static unsigned int g4x_primary_min_alignment(struct 
> > intel_plane *plane,
> >                                           const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >                                           int color_plane)
> >  {
> > +   struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> > +
> >     if (intel_plane_can_async_flip(plane, fb->modifier))
> >             return 256 * 1024;
> >  
> > +   if (intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
> > +           return 256 * 1024;
> > +
> >     switch (fb->modifier) {
> >     case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> >     case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > index ae7243ad6e0c..9157825e370b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > @@ -372,6 +372,11 @@ static unsigned int i9xx_cursor_min_alignment(struct 
> > intel_plane *plane,
> >                                           const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >                                           int color_plane)
> >  {
> > +   struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> > +
> > +   if (intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
> > +           return 256 * 1024;
> > +
> >     return 4 * 1024; /* physical for i915/i945 */
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
> > index dd3ac7f98dfc..2b9ad46eaef7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb_pin.c
> > @@ -126,14 +126,6 @@ intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >     if (drm_WARN_ON(dev, alignment && !is_power_of_2(alignment)))
> >             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >  
> > -   /* Note that the w/a also requires 64 PTE of padding following the
> > -    * bo. We currently fill all unused PTE with the shadow page and so
> > -    * we should always have valid PTE following the scanout preventing
> > -    * the VT-d warning.
> > -    */
> > -   if (intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(dev_priv) && alignment < 256 * 1024)
> > -           alignment = 256 * 1024;
> > -
> >     /*
> >      * Global gtt pte registers are special registers which actually forward
> >      * writes to a chunk of system memory. Which means that there is no risk
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> > index 13996d7059ad..d63e71fe469e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> > @@ -980,6 +980,11 @@ static unsigned int g4x_sprite_min_alignment(struct 
> > intel_plane *plane,
> >                                          const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >                                          int color_plane)
> >  {
> > +   struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(plane->base.dev);
> > +
> > +   if (intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
> > +           return 256 * 1024;
> > +
> >     return 4 * 1024;
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> > index 450dd8c64e0c..5cec2df0baca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> > @@ -649,6 +649,10 @@ static u32 skl_plane_min_alignment(struct intel_plane 
> > *plane,
> >     if (color_plane != 0)
> >             return 4 * 1024;
> >  
> > +   /*
> > +    * VT-d needs at least 256k alignment,
> > +    * but that's already covered below.
> > +    */
> >     switch (fb->modifier) {
> >     case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
> >     case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to