Refactor max scaling factor computation into a reusable
function for scalers.

--v2:
- Add missing comment. [Ankit]

Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.gol...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c | 70 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
index 12efa4008027..a832cdccd9fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
@@ -319,6 +319,44 @@ static int intel_allocate_scaler(struct 
intel_crtc_scaler_state *scaler_state,
        return -1;
 }
 
+static void
+calculate_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
+                   bool is_yuv_semiplanar,
+                   int scaler_id,
+                   int *max_hscale, int *max_vscale)
+{
+       struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc);
+
+       /*
+        * FIXME: When two scalers are needed, but only one of
+        * them needs to downscale, we should make sure that
+        * the one that needs downscaling support is assigned
+        * as the first scaler, so we don't reject downscaling
+        * unnecessarily.
+        */
+
+       if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14) {
+               /*
+                * On versions 14 and up, only the first
+                * scaler supports a vertical scaling factor
+                * of more than 1.0, while a horizontal
+                * scaling factor of 3.0 is supported.
+                */
+               *max_hscale = 0x30000 - 1;
+
+               if (scaler_id == 0)
+                       *max_vscale = 0x30000 - 1;
+               else
+                       *max_vscale = 0x10000;
+       } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 10 || !is_yuv_semiplanar) {
+               *max_hscale = 0x30000 - 1;
+               *max_vscale = 0x30000 - 1;
+       } else {
+               *max_hscale = 0x20000 - 1;
+               *max_vscale = 0x20000 - 1;
+       }
+}
+
 static int intel_atomic_setup_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
                                     int num_scalers_need, struct intel_crtc 
*crtc,
                                     const char *name, int idx,
@@ -388,35 +426,9 @@ static int intel_atomic_setup_scaler(struct 
intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
                const struct drm_rect *dst = &plane_state->uapi.dst;
                int hscale, vscale, max_vscale, max_hscale;
 
-               /*
-                * FIXME: When two scalers are needed, but only one of
-                * them needs to downscale, we should make sure that
-                * the one that needs downscaling support is assigned
-                * as the first scaler, so we don't reject downscaling
-                * unnecessarily.
-                */
-
-               if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14) {
-                       /*
-                        * On versions 14 and up, only the first
-                        * scaler supports a vertical scaling factor
-                        * of more than 1.0, while a horizontal
-                        * scaling factor of 3.0 is supported.
-                        */
-                       max_hscale = 0x30000 - 1;
-                       if (*scaler_id == 0)
-                               max_vscale = 0x30000 - 1;
-                       else
-                               max_vscale = 0x10000;
-
-               } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 10 ||
-                          !intel_format_info_is_yuv_semiplanar(fb->format, 
fb->modifier)) {
-                       max_hscale = 0x30000 - 1;
-                       max_vscale = 0x30000 - 1;
-               } else {
-                       max_hscale = 0x20000 - 1;
-                       max_vscale = 0x20000 - 1;
-               }
+               calculate_max_scale(crtc,
+                                   
intel_format_info_is_yuv_semiplanar(fb->format, fb->modifier),
+                                   *scaler_id, &max_hscale, &max_vscale);
 
                /*
                 * FIXME: We should change the if-else block above to
-- 
2.48.1

Reply via email to