On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jani Nikula
>> <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Fixes regression introduced by:
>>>> commit b3064154dfd37deb386b1e459c54e1ca2460b3d5
>>>> Author: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobs...@gmail.com>
>>>> Date:   Tue Mar 4 00:42:44 2014 +0100
>>>>     drm/i915: Don't just say it, actually force edp vdd
>>>
>>> Patrik, would you mind acking/testing this patch, as it blames your
>>> commit for regressing?
>>
>> Testing will be hard I guess since it does the equivalent change
>> Patrik has done to the pre-hsw dp code to the ddi hsw+ code. But a
>> review would be nice - I've signed up Damien for this but he seems to
>> be sick :(
>> -Daniel
>
> Yes, as expected, this patch applied on top of -nightly is working fine. It's
> the EDP_FORCE_VDD bit that is required for my Macbook Air 6,x.
>
> Is the proper fix for -fixes to completely revert:
> dff392dbd258381a6c3164f38420593f2d291e3b

Hi Patrik, I've done just that. Giving the drm-intel-fixes branch a spin
would be great, if you don't mind me asking.

BR,
Jani.

>
> Tested-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobs...@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks
> Patrik

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to