On Tue, 05 Nov 2024, Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapil...@intel.com> wrote:
> Use intel_display object instead of struct drm_i915_private in
> skl_plane_wm_equals(). This is in preparation for the rest of
> the patches in this series where hw support for the minimum and
> interim ddb allocations for async flip is added
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapil...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index 2018abc35c8a..a01b1dc01348 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -2384,13 +2384,13 @@ static bool skl_wm_level_equals(const struct
> skl_wm_level *l1,
> l1->blocks == l2->blocks;
> }
>
> -static bool skl_plane_wm_equals(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> +static bool skl_plane_wm_equals(struct intel_display *display,
> const struct skl_plane_wm *wm1,
> const struct skl_plane_wm *wm2)
> {
> int level;
>
> - for (level = 0; level < i915->display.wm.num_levels; level++) {
> + for (level = 0; level < display->wm.num_levels; level++) {
> /*
> * We don't check uv_wm as the hardware doesn't actually
> * use it. It only gets used for calculating the required
> @@ -2650,7 +2650,7 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> old_wm = &old_pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
> new_wm = &new_pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
>
> - if (skl_plane_wm_equals(i915, old_wm, new_wm))
> + if (skl_plane_wm_equals(&i915->display, old_wm, new_wm))
Please don't use "&i915->display" inline.c
> continue;
>
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
