Hi.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> Gustavo Sousa
> Sent: Friday, 4 October 2024 14.43
> To: Nikula, Jani <jani.nik...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@gmail.com>; i915-ci-in...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Miscelaneous fixes for display
> tracepoints
> (rev2)
>
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2024-10-04 08:33:20-03:00)
> >On Fri, 04 Oct 2024, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.so...@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Quoting Patchwork (2024-09-26 16:28:07-03:00)
> >>>#### Possible regressions ####
> >>>
> >>> * igt@i915_selftest@live:
> >>> - bat-mtlp-6: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
> >>> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15449/bat-mtlp-
> 6/igt@i915_selft...@live.html
> >>> [2]:
> >>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_137978v2/bat-mtlp
> >>> -6/igt@i915_selft...@live.html
> >>
> >> This does not seem related to this series, which is only about
> >> tracepoints.
> >>
> >> Jani or Rodrigo, ack to merge this series without triggering a new CI
> >> cycle? I don't believe CI exercises tests that enable tracepoints. Or
> >> does it?
> >
> >BAT *must* pass before merging, no exceptions.
>
> Okay. Thanks.
See original BAT results mail it says " If you think the reported changes have
nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_137978v2, please notify your bug team >
> (i915-ci-in...@lists.freedesktop.org)
to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
positives in CI."
>
> --
> Gustavo Sousa
>
> >
> >Full shard run failures can be looked over when it's clear the series
> >didn't cause the failures.
> >
> >
> >BR,
> >Jani.
> >
> >
> >--
> >Jani Nikula, Intel
