> -----Original Message----- > From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 2:23 PM > To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.bo...@intel.com> > Cc: jiangshan....@antgroup.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Nikula, Jani > <jani.nik...@intel.com>; Saarinen, Jani <jani.saari...@intel.com>; Kurmi, > Suresh Kumar <suresh.kumar.ku...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240709) > > Hello > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:42 PM Borah, Chaitanya Kumar > > commit 1726a17135905e2d2773f18d47bd4e17dd26e1ed > > Author: Lai Jiangshan mailto:jiangshan....@antgroup.com > > Date: Thu Jul 4 11:49:13 2024 +0800 > > > > workqueue: Put PWQ allocation and WQ enlistment in the same lock C.S. > > ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > > > > We could not revert the patch because of merge conflict but resetting to the > parent of the commit seems to fix the issue > > > > Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide a > fix if necessary? > > > It has been fixed and it is in wq/for-6.11. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/zpasnbn0hptvc...@slm.duckdns.org/ >
Thank you Lai for your response. Regards Chaitanya > Thanks > Lai
