On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 04:22:15PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > On 02/21/2014 06:45 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > [snip] > >v20: Refuse to implement read-only support until we have the required > > infrastructure - but reserve the bit in flags for future use. > > > >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > >Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> > >Cc: "Gong, Zhipeng" <zhipeng.g...@intel.com> > >Cc: Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com> > >Cc: "Volkin, Bradley D" <bradley.d.vol...@intel.com> > > Using the recently posted i-g-t test case: > > Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > Since I also spent a lot of time looking at it, could add a RB as > well if considered useful.
review of both patches considered highly useful. Consider yourself signed up ;-) Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
