In intel_crtc_vblank_work(), we access uapi.event before grabbing the
event_lock spinlock, but modify it inside the spinlock block.  This
causes some static analyzers to get confused and issue a warning.

The uapi.event value is not protected by the event_lock, so we can
safely move it out of the protected block to prevent false positives.

Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
index ca6dc1dc56c8..bf6e74e99f5c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
@@ -411,8 +411,8 @@ static void intel_crtc_vblank_work(struct kthread_work 
*base)
        if (crtc_state->uapi.event) {
                spin_lock_irq(&crtc->base.dev->event_lock);
                drm_crtc_send_vblank_event(&crtc->base, crtc_state->uapi.event);
-               crtc_state->uapi.event = NULL;
                spin_unlock_irq(&crtc->base.dev->event_lock);
+               crtc_state->uapi.event = NULL;
        }
 
        trace_intel_crtc_vblank_work_end(crtc);
-- 
2.39.2

Reply via email to