On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Follow in the footsteps of commit c610e841f19d ("drm/i915:
> Do plane/etc. updates more atomically across pipes") and
> do the plane disables back to back for all pipes also when
> we are disabling pipes.
>
> This should provide for a potentially more atomic user
> experience, which might be especially nice when using
> joiner or tiled displays.
Okay, so the difference is that previously we did call
intel_pre_plane_update/intel_crtc_disable_planes per crtc, but
now we first call first intel_pre_plane_update for each crtc
and then call intel_crtc_disable_planes per crtc.
So in cases when there are some cross pipe dependencies, that might be
more proper way. Just to clarify that I understood this right.
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 2351ee52d16e..01d7e91cb1bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -6795,11 +6795,16 @@ static void intel_commit_modeset_disables(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
> if (!old_crtc_state->hw.active)
> continue;
>
> - intel_crtc_disable_planes(state, crtc);
> -
> disable_pipes |= BIT(crtc->pipe);
> }
>
> + for_each_old_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i) {
> + if ((disable_pipes & BIT(crtc->pipe)) == 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + intel_crtc_disable_planes(state, crtc);
> + }
> +
> /* Only disable port sync and MST slaves */
> for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> new_crtc_state, i) {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
