On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.mo...@intel.com> wrote: > Instead of mixing display & non-display stuff together, move > display parameters i915_display_capabilities debugfs. This patch > will also drops unnecessary locking.
The locking removal could've been a separate patch. *shrug* Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > > V2: - Avoid multiple copies (Jani) > - Drop locking (Jani) > - Update commit msg (Bhanu) > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogan...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.mo...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c > index 6f2d13c8ccf7..90dc973ffb6b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c > @@ -625,6 +625,8 @@ static int i915_display_capabilities(struct seq_file *m, > void *unused) > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private); > struct drm_printer p = drm_seq_file_printer(m); > > + intel_display_params_dump(i915, &p); > + > intel_display_device_info_print(DISPLAY_INFO(i915), > DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915), &p); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 990eaa029d9c..0461327d3f82 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -74,10 +74,7 @@ static int i915_capabilities(struct seq_file *m, void > *data) > intel_gt_info_print(&to_gt(i915)->info, &p); > intel_driver_caps_print(&i915->caps, &p); > > - kernel_param_lock(THIS_MODULE); > i915_params_dump(&i915->params, &p); > - intel_display_params_dump(i915, &p); > - kernel_param_unlock(THIS_MODULE); > > return 0; > } -- Jani Nikula, Intel
