Thanks! I am planning to present GMEM in Linux MM Alignment Sessions so I can collect more input from the mm developers.
@Christian @Oak I will also send you invitations once a presentation is scheduled. :) -Weixi -----Original Message----- From: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 10:55 PM To: zhuweixi <weixi....@huawei.com>; Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com>; Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com> Cc: linux...@kvack.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; a...@linux-foundation.org; weixi....@openeuler.sh; mgor...@suse.de; jgli...@redhat.com; rcampb...@nvidia.com; jhubb...@nvidia.com; apop...@nvidia.com; mhairgr...@nvidia.com; z...@nvidia.com; alexander.deuc...@amd.com; xinhui....@amd.com; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org; felix.kuehl...@amd.com; ogab...@kernel.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; j...@nvidia.com; leo...@nvidia.com; zhen...@linux.intel.com; zhi.a.w...@intel.com; intel-gvt-...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nik...@linux.intel.com; joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com; rodrigo.v...@intel.com; tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices On 29.11.23 09:27, zhuweixi wrote: > Glad to hear that more sharable code is desirable. > IMHO, for a common MM subsystem, it is more beneficial for GMEM to > extend core MM instead of building a separate one. More core-mm complexity, awesome, we all love that! ;) -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
