> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 10:28 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Replace a memset() with zero
> initialization
>
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Declaring a struct and immediately zeroing it with memset() seems a bit silly
> to me. Just zero initialize the struct when declaring it.
>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index ef57dad1a9cb..0376adc36780 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -4465,12 +4465,10 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private
> *i915,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state) {
> - struct intel_dpll_hw_state dpll_hw_state;
> + struct intel_dpll_hw_state dpll_hw_state = {};
> u8 pipe_mask;
> bool active;
>
> - memset(&dpll_hw_state, 0, sizeof(dpll_hw_state));
> -
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s\n", pll->info->name);
>
> active = intel_dpll_get_hw_state(i915, pll, &dpll_hw_state);
> --
> 2.41.0
